I have enclosed a link to the Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery.
I have submitted 4 publications to this journal that I would like for all of you to review.
Two are relevant to Minimally Invasive AVR/MVR, one on Minimally Invasive AVR, and one on Building a Minimally Invasive Valve Program, of which I was a co-author with Dr. Tom Nguyen.
In addition, I think that all of the contributions to this journal are significant and will help advance the subspecialty of minimally invasive valve surgery.
I urge all to subscribe.
There are previous editions of this journal which are excellent and I believe serve as a reference for all Cardiothoracic Surgeons.
www.annalscts.com

As I have mentioned in a previous blog, I have been getting more comfortable with using Del Nido Cardioplegia.

I have enclosed the components that we utilize.

We use a 4:1, blood: cardioplegia ratio

I believe that it has been described using a 1:4 ratio.

I usually deliver a 2 liter induction dose and then I give an additional 500cc , 45-55 minutes later.

I would recommend not giving an additional dose within 20 minutes of unclamping because I have noticed that the heart is a bit more stunned and takes longer to resume electrical activity.

1 liter of Plasmalyte or Isolyte or Normasol

Mannitol 20% 16 mL
Magnesium 2 g 4 mL
KCL 35 mEq
Sodium Bicarbonate 13 mL
Lidocaine 2% 6.5 mL

I usually end up using approximately 2 liters of this cardioplegia because I also utilize this solution to irrigate the aortic root and LV after debriding the calcium or for testing my mitral valve repair.

I know that we are all busy in our daily work and family lives , but please take the time to answer a few questions.
Everyone who has subscribed to the blog has an interest in minimally invasive surgery.
To those that don’t accept it, it is disruptive. To those that embrace it, realize that the future is minimally invasive surgery.

1. How can we disseminate the word to the public?
2. How can we better train surgeons?
3. Why is adoption slow?
4. How can we facilitate the operation? (Different techniques or instruments)
5.  Should these techniques be offered to all surgeons? (Recently graduated or experienced surgeons)

Our patients have benefited and there is a real benefit. Don’t let the skeptics and antagonists cloud our vision of the future. Remember, nothing comes easily, but those who change the current philosophies in cardiac surgery are those who contribute to its advancement.

Please respond directly through the blog or my personal email (jlamelasmd@aol.com)

I value EVERYONE’S response. They will be kept anonymous unless you chose otherwise.

http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/760718?t=1

I came across this interview that Dr. Michael Moront and I participated in during an STS meeting 2 years ago in Ft. Lauderdale.

Despite being 2 years old, the concepts still hold true.

Check it out !!!

I have always found it difficult to identify where the 4th or 5th intercostal space is located by counting the ribs.  After performing thousands of cases,  I have figured out the most simplistic and accurate way to make your incision is to use the mid portion of the sternum as your external landmark. That means that I mark the mid way point from the supra sternal notch to the lowest portion of the xiphoid.  I start my incision exactly at this point at the anterior axillary line and curve it superiorly.In 98 % of the cases this will be exactly where you will find the best visibility of the mitral valve. I have enclosed a picture of a male patient. Same holds true for a female. I will post pictures of female patients later this weekend with different options to consider.

Sorry but the OR is calling.